Chek-ke̍k khòng-piān

Wikipedia (chū-iû ê pek-kho-choân-su) beh kā lí kóng...

Tsik-ki̍k khòng-piān (ing-gú: affirmative defense; hân-gú: 積極抗辯; khak-jīn ê khòng-piān (確認的抗辯), khíng-tīng-sìng ê tah-piān (肯定性答辯); tsik-ki̍k ê tah-piān (積極的答辯)) teh îng-bí huat-hē lāi-té sī-tsí bîn-sū sòo-siōng [en] hi̍k-tsiá hîng-sū ê tsí-khòng, sī tû-liáu guan-ko-tsiá [en] hi̍k-tsiá kiám-tshat-kuann sóo tsí-tshing ê sū-si̍t í-guā; ná iah-koh ū tsi̍t-tsoo sū-si̍t, king-kuè pī-kò [en] tsìng-bîng, kiat-kó guân-kò-tsiá hi̍k-tsiá kiám-tshat-kuann ê kò-sòo sit-pāi, hi̍k-tsiá kiám-khin pī-kò ê hui-huat hîng-uî tsi huat-lu̍t tsuē-tsik ê khòng-piān uì-tsi. Teh bîn-sū sòo-siōng [en] tang-tiong, tsik-ki̍k khòng-piān pau-kuat: tsà-khi hông-tsí-huat, khì-kuân, í-ki̍p kî-thann tsóo-khiok uî-huat sū-hāng; tsu-jû Bí-kok liân-pang bîn-sū sòo-siōng tîng-sū tē 8(c) tiâu sóo-lia̍t ê siau-bia̍t sî-hāu. Teh hîng-sū sòo-siōng-huat tang-tiong, tsik-ki̍k khòng-piān ê huān-lē tsik-sī tsìng-tong hông-uī,[1] tsing-sîn tsiòng-gāi piān-hōo [en],[2] tsip-huat khuan-thò [en],[3] í-ki̍p siau-bia̍t sî-hāu [en] tíng-tíng.

Tsù-kái[siu-kái | kái goân-sí-bé]

  1. Neubauer, David W. (2005). America's Courts and the Criminal Justice System. Wadsworth. p. 320. ISBN 0-534-62892-3.  (Eng-gí)
  2. "Insanity defense". LII / Legal Information Institute (ēng Eng-gí). 2021-10-25 khòaⁿ--ê. 
  3. "Entrapment". Wex. Cornell Law School. 25 October 2021 khòaⁿ--ê.  (Eng-gí)

Tsham-ua̍t[siu-kái | kái goân-sí-bé]

  • Answer (law)

Guā-pōo liân-kiat[siu-kái | kái goân-sí-bé]